• Implements support for <group>, <attributeGroup>, and <all>.
• Fixed round trip of complex types containing sequences.
• Generates toXML into the companion objects to simplify the case class.

For example,

<xs:complexType name="Address">
  <xs:sequence>
    <xs:element name="name"   type="xs:string"/>
    <xs:element name="street" type="xs:string"/>
    <xs:element name="city"   type="xs:string"/>
  </xs:sequence>
</xs:complexType>

turns to

case class Address(name: String,

From XML Schema Part 1:

The XML representation for a model group definition schema component is a <group> element information item. It provides for naming a model group for use by reference in the XML representation of complex type definitions and model groups.

The <group> construct allows the schema designers to reuse part of the content model without resorting to type derivation. This comes in handy when dealing with complicated schema. Suppose we have a group named head.misc and an element named head.

• Implements parsing of content models using parser combinators.
• Implements support for xsi:nillable (GH-3).

The following code is an example of a generated parser:

object Address extends rt.ElemNameParser[Address] {
  val targetNamespace = "http://www.example.com/IPO"

  def parser(node: scala.xml.Node): Parser[Address] =
    (rt.ElemName(targetNamespace, "name")) ~ 
      (rt.ElemName(targetNamespace, "street")) ~ 

In XML, one can omit an element to express lack of value or use an empty element.

Sometimes it is desirable to represent an unshipped item, unknown information, or inapplicable information explicitly with an element, rather than by an absent element.

The trouble with using an empty element <foo></foo> is that the emptiness would no longer matches the specified type like xs:positiveInteger. It is possible to form a xs:union of xs:positiveInteger and an xs:enumeration with only empty string in it to allow either poistive integers or empty string. However, technically speaking, an empty string is different from pure emptiness. In terms of code, it's the difference between null and "", or in Scala, None and Some("").

XML Schema resolves this issue by introducing a special attribute called xsi:nil. By writing

<price xsi:nil="true" />

I've known the limitation of hand parsing for a while. Parsing that relies on token positions quickly gets out of hand when there are more complex grammars like repetitions, options, and choices of sequences. At some point, I decided to use scala's parser combinators to do the parsing of content types, but it's been a long way to implement it.

First let's look at a real-life example of such complex structure:

<complexType name="SubjectType">
    <choice>
        <sequence>
            <choice>
                <element ref="saml:BaseID"/>

Added support for mixed contents. in which text nodes are placed in conjunction with subelements within an element. Similar to the way I handled <any>, text nodes are placed in DataRecord[String] object along with other DataRecord objects under a member value called mixed.

Suppose we have a schema that looks like this:

<element name="Element3">
  <complexType mixed="true">
    <choice maxOccurs="unbounded">
      <element ref="ipo:Choice1"/>
      <element ref="ipo:Choice2"/>

Last time I wrote:

Next goal is to handle <any> without ignoring it completely using this generic container. I can probably store the scala.xml.Elem object "as is" in a collection. The user of round trip probably would expect that I don't lose luggage during the flight.

That's pretty much what I did for two usages of <any> handled by scalaxb. First pattern is that it could appear as part of the sequence.

<element name="Choice1">
  <complexType>
    <sequence>
      <any namespace="##any" processContents="lax" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded"/>

I started implementation of round trip: xml document -> scala object -> back to xml document. Currently done with elements and attributes tracked in the case class. Suppose you have the following document:

val subject = <shipTo xmlns="http://www.example.com/IPO"
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xmlns:ipo="http://www.example.com/IPO"
    xsi:type="ipo:USAddress">
  <name>Foo</name>
  <street>1537 Paper Street</street>
  <city>Wilmington</city>
  <state>DE</state>
  <zip>19808</zip>
</shipTo>

You can now generate classes under different packages per-namespace.

  -p:<namespaceURI>=<package> | --package:<namespaceURI>=<package>
        specifies the target package for <namespaceURI>

For example XML Signature and SAML 2.0 assertion probably should be under different package name:

I've heard on occasions that the way attributes work in XML is a mess. It is. The fault is not at attributes per se, but it's the way XML namespace is implemented that's confusing. The spec is called Namespaces in XML 1.0. Try to keep a straight face.

1. Default namespace declarations do not apply directly to attribute names.
2. The interpretation of unprefixed attributes is determined by the element on which they appear.
3. The namespace name for an unprefixed attribute name always has no value.
4. In all cases, the local name is local part.
5. No tag may contain two attributes which have identical names.
6. No tag may contain two attributes which have qualified names with the same local part and with prefixes which have been bound to namespace names that are identical.
7. All element and attribute names contain either zero or one colon.
8. No attributes with a declared type of ID, IDREF(S), ENTITY(IES), or NOTATION contain any colons.